![]() |
Geoff Cox - playing with clay | |
|
..
. .. . . - -... . . .
- - - -
. . ...
|
||
|
About the work I specialised in silversmithing to degree level and even though I had used clay I knew little of pottery. In some ways, the lack of a formal education in ceramics can be quite liberating. When there's no one to say "you can't do that" or "that's already been done", every new idea is a personal voyage of discovery uncluttered by work that's gone before. Perhaps without a map it's easier to find your own unique path. |
||
|
Early work
-
1974 Some time later
I began to use the same techniques to make figurative work, manipulating
textured and distorted sheets to make costume onto cylinders of clay.
Hands and faces were modelled individually to make each piece unique.
The human figure has been an important element in my work ever since. |
![]() more images |
|
|
Warriors
- 1980 / 2000 Eventually
I felt I'd been there, done that (for now). Time to take stock and start
again. |
||
|
Aztecs 1995 / 2005 In the mid 90s I began a series of heads (life size and bigger) with a South American feel. Features modelled individually, costumes from rolled out and textured sheets. These pieces suggested remnants of an actual culture though still purely imaginery - a sort of mixture of Aztec and Conquestador. One thing I've noticed over the years is at a certain point in the process an interesting thing happens. The figure takes on a life of it's own. At that moment it's as if I hadn't made it - it exists completely independent of me. This came as a shock and a revelation. Would it still happen with more abstract figures? Perhaps another area to explore ? |
||
|
Cylinder Figures - 2000 / 2006
In 2000
I began playing with the idea of very simple figures - no arms or
legs, no features. How abstract could they become and still have human
attributes. Was it recognisable human features that gave them life
or was it something more intangible ?
I began to become more aware of the relationship of two figures - the
way they interacted. As humans we learn to read the subtleties of body
language. Perhaps the voices of these new figures standing side by side
appeared as conspiratorial whispers.
The figures never come fully formed. They start with a vague idea but are elusive and often the harder you try to reach a resolution the more they slip and slide away. In the end you have to relinquish control and let the material decide. It's an ongoing process that can't be rushed. Keep making them and they slowly resolve themselves in their own time. |
![]() more images |
|
|
Soda fired - 2007 I'd
only ever fired in an electric kiln but in 2006 I built a small gas kiln
to experiment with direct flame onto the work. Having always relied on
the clay to play a major part in the design process maybe the kiln would
provide a new dimension. And so I began to use washing soda as a glazing
medium. When this is dissolved in water then squirted through a garden
sprayer directly into the kiln at top temperature it's deposited on the
work through the path of the flame. Where it touches the figures, the
soda combines with the silica of the clay body to form a natural glaze.
As it does this most effectively on thin edges it suggested ways to develop
the figures to take best advantage of the process.
|
![]() more images |
|
|
Seated Ladies - 2008 Although I never design work on paper, for many years I've drawn from life. I didn't consciously do this as an aid to making figurative work but for the academic discipline of observation and eye hand co-ordination. A way to ground the figure in a life drawing and place it in space is to indicate it's surroundings - the floor, seat, etc. I've now begun to explore the idea of placing figures in an environment - this to potentially put them in a context. With little in the way of costume their surroundings might suggest a story to an observer. This work is still in its development stages and the environments are becoming more theatrical. |
![]() more images |
|
|
Reading the
above would suggest that things were the result of a natural progression
but ideas never come in straight lines and several other projects sprang
up along the way. Some were obviously connected some less so. Some were
short lived one offs others 1995 / 2000
/ 2009 - Standing stones Do we need
to know why we make what we do or is it enough to live our own story and
let others make of it what they will ? |
||